My Channel News

Monday, September 14th, 2009

Infertility Breakthrough – Evolutionary Battle Between The Sexes

These days it is believed that approximately 10% of couples actively trying to conceive a child experience fertility difficulties. Some blame the increase of pollution in the world environment while others point to stress as a major contributing factor. However a researcher from Israel has a completely different take on the cause of infertility. According to Dr Oren Hasson, who is an evolutionary biologist at the University of Tel Aviv, the reproductive organs of the two sexes are involved in a kind of “evolutionary war” which Dr Hasson says is far from over.

According to Hasson the increase in the rate of infertility does not add up on from an evolutionary point of view. “By now, evolution should have improved our reproductive success rate. Something else is going on.” he said.

He set to work out more about the issue with the assistance of Prof. Lewi Stone, also from The University of Tel Aviv, working in the Biomathematics Division. Together they combined mathematical models with empirical evidence and came up with some very interesting conclusions.

They concluded that over thousands of years women’s’ bodies have forced male sperm to become “more competitive” with the “super swimmers” being awarded the prize of fertilizing the egg. As a reaction the male half of the population is now over producing the amount of these more aggressive sperm in order to increase the chances of successful fertilization.

But says Dr Hasson these changes serve to demonstrate the Law of Unintended Consequences as well. Those unintended consequences may have a lot to do with timing. When the “winning” sperm enters an egg it usually triggers a biochemical response to prevent other sperm from following it inside, which would kill the egg. It may now be though that even though this biochemical shield takes just minutes to deploy that some of these “super sperm” are breaking into the egg, terminating the whole process before it ever really began.

But according to this research the difficulties don’t end there. Women’s bodies have naturally begun developing defenses to this condition which is commonly known as “polyspermy” To avoid the potential death of a fertilized egg the female reproductive organs have changed, now forming a formidable barrier to most sperm. According to Dr Hasson “They eject, dilute, divert and kill spermatozoa so that only about a single spermatozoon gets into the vicinity of a viable egg at the right time.”

In simpler terms in response to any changes in the efficiency of male sperm is responded to by the female body in an apparently defensive manner. “This fuels the ‘arms race’ between the sexes and leads to the evolutionary cycle going on right now in the entire animal world.” The report concludes.

The reports entire findings were published in the Journal Biological Reviews.

5 Responses to “Infertility Breakthrough – Evolutionary Battle Between The Sexes”

L B Says:

This does not make sense. How do men’s and women’s bodies evolve based on a brief moment of contact, especially men’s bodies who have no way of knowing how the women’s body is reacting to sperm?

Aine Says:

To L.B.:
If men’s bodies didn’t evolve, the spieces would simply die out. Since that hasn’t happened …

Let me try again: It didn’t work, it didn’t work, it didn’t work, it didn’t work: oh, look, there’s only one type that works.

And it isn’t a moment of brief contact, it’s repeated exposure, barring oaths of celebacy. Often with the same mate. Unfortunately I’m neither a scientist, nor a pre-school teacher, so I’m not sure how to help you get it. Luckily, the odds of you ever looking back at the article and reading my response to you are quite low, so it probably doesn’t really matter.

It’s interesting. I’m emailing it to my boyfriend. Thank God I’m seeking the end of the gene pool who would “get it” without explaination.

Alex Says:

L B, think of it this way…if you don’t have “super sperm” it is hard for you to impregnate your mate, which means the union results in a small number of offspring, or more likely, you adopt. If you do, you likely end up having several children, perhaps having some accidents early in life which are put up for adoption by none other than those who lack your “super sperm”…rinse and repeat for several thousand years..and you have evolution. A larger population of men possessing this super sperm.

Linda B Says:

The “brief” moment of physical contact is irrelevant from an evolutionary standpoint. In fact, we accumulate many small changes in our DNA over our lifetime, and that includes changes to sperm, which are continually dividing and always at risk for slight DNA changes. A single change in a single base pair out of many millions could be the change that allows a sperm to be more successful (or fatal to the sperm). Changes like this happen all the time in nature. As an example, it is why we need different flu vaccines every year…a single small change in the DNA can have enormous consequences. As another example, it is why we were able to develop so many new species of dogs over the past few centuries.

Paladin Says:

It’s amazing how everyone will unquestioningly accept basic suppositions. Do we really know if the infertility rate is higher than it was 100 or 1000 years ago? Remember that for a couple to have a fertility problem, only one spouse has to be infertile; thus, 10 percent isn’t as bad as it sounds.

I should also point out that there are enough old stories about “barren” women and kings who couldn’t manage to sire an heir to give us good reason to believe that the scope of this problem is not unprecedented.

Leave a Reply

ADVERTISE HERE: 80X80 Pixels