My Channel News

Wednesday, October 14th, 2009

Researchers Answer another Piece of the Prostate Cancer Puzzle

Many medical professionals who treat prostate cancer patients – primarily oncologists and radiologists – have long been puzzled by a single question. Why do some men who demonstrate elevated PSA levels who are regularly and carefully monitored, and demonstrate repeated negative results at biopsy still go on to develop aggressive and difficult to treat prostate cancer? Researchers at the Princess Margaret Hospital now believe they have found the answer.

It is they say, that tumors can lie hidden on the top of the prostate where they are undetectable by the most commonly used diagnostic tools, including the needle guided biopsy. Their research demonstrates that the use of MRI technology is far more effective at spotting these hidden, but potentially dangerous growths.

A team consisting of urologists, pathologists and radiologists studied 31 patients at the hospital who had demonstrated positive biopsy results and whose tumors lay at the top of their prostate, as seen on an MRI scan. They found that in 87% of the cases the scan found the hidden tumors fairly easily.

The team has given a name to these lurking dangers. PEATS, which stands for” prostate evasive anterior tumor syndrome” and they feel that this is something that all those who treat men with elevated PSA levels should become more familiar with the concept in order to diagnose the presence of prostate cancer most effectively.

In Great Britain , where the Princess Margaret Hospital is located and the study conducted , about 34,000 new cases of prostate cancer are diagnosed every year, while in the United States there are on average 192,280 prostate cancer diagnoses made each year and 27,360 deaths as a result.

Another recent British study, this time conducted by researchers from the University of Liverpool, has been able to make another break through. They discovered that the presence of a genetic heat shock marker – called Hsp-27 – could provide a reliable indicator of how prostate cancer would progress in individual patients. According to the authors of that study the presence of Hsp – 27 at the time of diagnosis were almost twice as likely to die from the disease as those men in whom it was not detected.

There are numerous ways to treat prostate cancer once it is diagnosed and medical professionals feel that the discovery of this molecule marker may help them spare some men from treatments that may be unnecessary, especially given that a number of the common treatments do have significant side effects.

6 Responses to “Researchers Answer another Piece of the Prostate Cancer Puzzle”

Tom Says:

This could mean that expensive MRI’s will be used instead of biopsies. The more research, the more do medical costs go up. They keep going up much faster than inflation. If this continues, in 50 years most of our federal budget will go to medical care, and our taxes will be sky high. Maybe we should outlaw all research except research to see if specific already existing treatments are better than others or than no treatment.

George Says:

Great idea, Tom—-then we can save more money which is far more important than saving lives!

vance brown Says:

my father suffered unknown to him for years & didn’t even know he had this cancer until it was too late to treat with any kind of effective method. prostate cancer is the WORST thing that can happen to a man because there is no pain symptons that would alert someone of the promblem. however modern technology in medicine has made significant breakthroughs in the treatment of this cancer. tom i hope that you don’t have this problem! early detection is the most important thing you can do. i kind of agree with on the reseach issue, but the thing is that why waste taxpayers money on something that the pharmacutical industy wil try to sell you as “THE MAGIC BULLET CURE”. anyone’s best option is to have faith in god & let him decide what your lifespan will be. everybody should realize that we have a limited time on this earth! GOD BLESS YOU tom for at least having an concern about this issue! signing off brother & take care. vance brown hopes to see you in heaven!

Dave Williams Says:

I would believe that missing a diagnosis and spending the money to treat a un detected turmor that progresses will probably far outway the cost of the MRI.

Dave

John Says:

Tom,

You’re an idiot.
Do you think an MRI is really that much more expensive than a biopsy? I would estimate that there is less than a couple percent difference in costs between the two and would not be surprised if a biopsy costs more.
If there was no more research where would new treatments come from you to compare?
There are many ways that health costs could be contained. But, preventive care is not one of them.

John Abert Says:

Tom,
With even minimal insurance, which I have because that’s what my employer offers, the cost of the MRI was in the same range as the cost of the biopsy. In fact, the cost of my last biopsy was nearly my life, since I suffered severe rectal bleeding for over 5 hours and lost 6 pints of blood.
As a prostate cancer survivor who has had his prostate frozen in a very invasive surgery — only to see it return –
I will never have another biopsy unless it is performed in a hospital with a recovery room provided for a blood infusion.
My urologist now agrees with my decision to wait until my PSA doubles — 1.4 — before deciding on another tack.
I am sold on the MRI, which also told my caregivers that my cancer had not spread to any other organs. That. at least. was comforting.

Leave a Reply

ADVERTISE HERE: 80X80 Pixels